More On ADKAR And Easier Change
My objective with my five principles is a simple model for what you or organizations actually need to do to be effective in all sorts of situations. ADKAR (previous post) looks helpful for organizations. Stephen Covey's seven habits work well with individuals. Both could be stretched to the opposite situation (organizations or individuals), but most systems are designed primarily for certain types of challenges and from a single point of view.
ADKAR's elements - Awareness, Desire, Knowledge, Ability, Reinforcement - effectively describe end results needed for organizational change. As a memory aid they don't point toward HOW to achieve these, which is where I find most managers ask the most urgent questions. The strategy is good; how can it be executed?
Take "desire" for example. Desire or motivation often seems to managers the most difficult thing to develop in yourself or others if it isn't there to begin with. ADKAR accurately suggests that once you become aware of the need for change you need to create a state of wanting to or desiring change. But how?
My corresponding principle is "positive." I describe the five principles as habits you need to build toward in yourself, others or both. With this in mind, I think managers have a relatively easier time concluding what they need to do - talk and behave in ways that get people into habits of feeling positive about aspects of work in general. Most can think of ways to be more positive, more of the time.
You can't usually get a group of people fired up, motivated or filled with desire to change on the spur of the moment. There are exceptions. When the theater you're in is burning or some other inescapable crisis makes it absolutely clear that you should all be motivated, pretty well any leader who stands up and points to the door is seen as charismatic.
Highly charismatic individuals seem to have the ability to motivate groups purely through words. Unfortunately lots of CEOs attempt this by putting speeches on video and sending them out to the troops. Needless to say, lots fail.
But if you work with a group of people over time and have always been honest and positive with them, encouraged them to take initiative, and they've seen the results that occur when they jump into action as you suggest, they are very likely to do so again when you point out that change is needed. They build on already positive beliefs that taking action makes sense. They are positive about acting and positive they can succeed. That's how "desire" bubbles up when needed - a lot of small positive elements adding together.
Am I splitting hairs? Maybe. But my focus is decidedly in favor of describing what's needed in terms people can most easily see how to put into action. Consistently positive people make both organizational and personal change far easier.
Comments